New jail policy dead after three days
Bankruptcy Trustees: How to Keep them from Getting Verklempt
Bankruptcy Trustees: How to Keep them from Getting Verklempt
Filing bankruptcy cases means–very soon after the case has been filed–dealing with bankruptcy trustees. I’ve practiced bankruptcy law for fifteen years now, and one thing I’ve learned about bankruptcy trustees is that they are all different. No two ask for exactly the same documents. And no two want things done exactly the same way. They all have their peeves and policies, and the challenge faced by bankruptcy attorneys is to know what each trustee demands in order to keep the cases flowing smoothly.
Emotionally distraught trustees remind me of the Mike Meyers character, Linda Richman. On Saturday Night Live Linda would discuss various issues and, if she got worked up, she’d announce that she was getting “verklempt.” In case you don’t know what this meant, I’ll clue you in. It meant Linda was experiencing angst–getting emotionally upset.
If at all possible, you don’t want a verklempt trustee on your hands. So here are some suggestions on how to avoid that.
If Your Trustee Wants It With Purple Glitter in the Upper Right Hand Corner–Give it to Her that Way
Okay. I’ll admit it, no trustee I’ve dealt with wanted documents to be provided with purple glitter. But you’re missing the point here. If your trustee wants certain documents or wants them a certain order, or wants them provided in a certain way, just do what’s asked! Each trustee has a paper blizzard to deal with. They get a lot of cases assigned to them. But they all must come up with systems to deal with their paper blizzard. Some want only last year’s tax return, some want two or three years’ returns. Some like documents via email (“so we don’t have to shred them after scanning them”) and others want them provided on paper (“I don’t want to pay to print all those documents”). Know your trustee, and provide what she requests the way she requests it.
If You’re a New Bankruptcy Lawyer, Go Meet Your Trustees
If you’ve just begun practicing bankruptcy law, or are new to your district, I suggest you meet your bankruptcy trustees. When you call for an appointment, they’ll likely be confused, but after the shock wears off, they’ll be impressed that you cared enough to find out how they wanted things done. You took the initiative to call them, to go see them, and to find out how to make their life a bit easier. They’ll appreciate that–especially if you follow up with their suggestions, and that will make a positive impression.
Don’t Quibble Over Things that Don’t Matter
I recently had a trustee question how I exempted a particular item of property under our South Carolina exemption statute, which is fairly new. There’s an issue about how to claim exemptions, and that issue hasn’t been resolved by our bankruptcy court yet. The trustee had a problem with the way I’d done something. It didn’t matter whether I did it my way or his way, so I just amended to do it his way. Why? Because it just doesn’t matter. Pick your fights with trustees carefully. Only fight over issues which are outcome-determinative for your client. Then, fight hard and do a thorough job. Trustees respect bankruptcy lawyers who care about their clients and who aren’t pushovers on substantive issues. But if it’s not substantive, get out your purple glitter.
Your Case Should be Like Butter
Or, as Linda Richman would say, “like buttah!”‘ Smooth. You want your cases to flow. Your clients will be happier, the trustee will be happier, and you won’t waste time fighting over things that just don’t matter. Give it up, Bubala!
And then there’s Rhode Island….
Rhode Island is neither a road, nor an island. Discuss!
DISCLAIMER: Nothing in this blog posts should be construed to suggest that any District of South Carolina bankruptcy trustee resembles Linda Richman or has, at any time, exhibited signs of being verklempt.
DEDICATION: This post is dedicated to Barbara Streisand.
Photo Credit: Padumbumpsh via Flickr
ACLU files claim against ICE for harassing U.S. citizens
"In a formal administrative complaint filed with United States Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) today, ACLU lawyers blasted the agency for an unwarranted immigration roundup of dozens of Denver-area residents last April that included the illegal arrest and illegal search of United States citizens and legal immigrants who had done absolutely nothing wrong. “This is a case of racial profiling and ethnic stereotyping at its very worst,” said Mark Silverstein, ACLU Legal Director. “An ICE agent targeted our clients for speaking Spanish in an Omaha fast-food restaurant. Speaking Spanish is not a crime, nor does it provide any basis for immigration officers to start demanding papers or otherwise launch any investigation.”" ACLU, Nov. 15, 2010.
Former judge sentenced in immigration fraud case
Tuesday, October 19, 2010 5:22 PM EDT
Former judge sentenced in immigration fraud case
By Surojit Chatterjee
A former New York Supreme Court judge has been sentenced to two years in prison after being convicted of running an "immigration fraud mill."
Salvador Collazo, who ran a law practice in Bronx, was sentenced last week, by Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin, to two years in prison for filing bogus green-card applications. The judge has called the fraud "predatory" in nature.
Last month, Dalia Preldakaj, Collazo's paralegal was sentenced to 6 and 1/2 years in prison.
In April 2010, a trial court had found Collazo and Preldakaj guilty of preparing hundreds of fraudulent applications for amnesty and other related immigration benefits on behalf of their immigration clients and then submitting those applications to the United States Department of Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
An investigation led the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to submit evidence that Collazo had falsely signed an amnesty application, under penalty of perjury, that he had personal knowledge of all of the information contained in the application, or that the information had been provided to him directly by the applicant, when in fact he did not and it had not.
Evidence submitted against Preldakaj showed that she charged clients exorbitant amount of money by falsely claiming they were fees charged by USCIS and depositing the illegal gains in nominee bank accounts that did not belong to her but which she controlled.
Preldakaj was also accused of witness tampering in August 2009 while she was on bail.
While Collazo was found guilty of one count each of conspiracy to commit immigration application fraud, immigration application fraud, and false statements, Preldakaj was found guilty of one count each of conspiracy to commit immigration application fraud, immigration application fraud, charging excessive fees in connection with immigration applications, money laundering, engaging in an unlawful monetary transaction, and witness tampering.
Collazo, who was elected to New York Civil Court in 1991 and was designated an acting New York Supreme Court justice two years later, was kicked off the bench in 1998 by the New York Court of Appeals for passing a lewd note to a court attorney about an intern's "knockers" and then later suggesting to the intern to remove her top despite knowing very well she wore nothing underneath.
The Supreme Court of the State of New York is the trial-level court of general jurisdiction in the state court system of New York.
Time is running out for NY pardons
PROCEDURE FOR SEEKING A PARDON TO RELIEVE DEPORTATION CONSEQUENCES
Those seeking pardons should send the following information by way of letter to:
The Executive Clemency Unit
New York State Division of Parole
97 Central Avenue
Albany, New York 12206
• Applicant’s name
• Applicant’s address
• A contact phone number for the applicant or his or her legal representative or advocate
• Applicant’s date of birth
• Applicant’s country of birth or citizenship
• Applicant’s Social Security Number
• Whether Immigration proceeding are pending and the status of those proceedings
• What was the crime (or crimes) for which the applicant is seeking a pardon
• A short description of the crime and the place where it occurred
• Date of sentencing and the sentence received
• Whether the applicant is currently in State or federal custody or under parole supervision
Applicants should also submit any other information that might be helpful to the Pardon Panel, including but not limited to information regarding their family circumstances, their employment, any community or other public service they have performed, and any rehabilitation programs they have attended.
There is no application form for requesting a pardon. All pardon requests must be submitted by October 1, 2010.


