Geygan & Geygan, Ltd.

A Cincinnati Immigration Law Firm

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Directions
      • Geygan & Geygan, Ltd.
      • Cleveland Immigration Court
      • USCIS Cincinnati Field Office
    • Why I do what I do
  • Immigration
    • Family Immigration Home
      • K-1 Petition for Alien Fiancé(e)
      • Marriage Green Card
      • Removal of Conditions on Status (I-751)
    • Investment Immigration
      • E-2 Treaty Investor Visa
      • EB-5 Visas
    • Employment Immigration
      • Employment-Based Immigration: First Preference EB-1
      • Employment-Based Immigration: Second Preference EB-2
      • Employment Immigration H-1B
    • Naturalization 2021
    • Preventing Deportation
      • Immigration Court Video
      • Immigration Law Violations
      • Cancellation of Removal
      • I-212 Waivers
      • I-601 Waiver of Inadmissibility
    • Work Card or Employment Authorization Document
    • Nonimmigrant Options
      • H-1B Visas For Specialty Occupations, Like Yours
      • The B Visas: Business or Pleasure?
      • Types of Visas for Temporary Visitors
      • E-1/E-2 Eligibility Requirements
        • The E-1 Treaty Trader Visa
          • E-1 Treaty Traders Details
        • E-2 Treaty Investor Visa
    • I-601A Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver
    • I-601 Waiver of Inadmissibility
    • Criminal Law and Immigration
    • Temporary Protected Status
    • USCIS Processing Times Calculator 2021
  • Legal Information
  • Archive & Site Map
  • Client Portal

USCIS Puts Additional Burdens On Nonimmigrant Worker Extension Petitions

October 24, 2017 by Thomas Geygan

Under updated policy guidance, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is instructing its officers to apply the same level of scrutiny to both initial petitions and extension requests for certain nonimmigrant visa categories. The guidance applies to nearly all nonimmigrant classifications filed using Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker.
“USCIS officers are at the front lines of the administration’s efforts to enhance the integrity of the immigration system,” said USCIS Director L. Francis Cissna. “This updated guidance provides clear direction to help advance policies that protect the interests of U.S. workers.”

As before, adjudicators must thoroughly review the petition and supporting evidence to determine eligibility for the benefit sought. The updated guidance instructs officers to apply the same level of scrutiny when reviewing nonimmigrant visa extension requests even where the petitioner, beneficiary and underlying facts are unchanged from a previously approved petition. While adjudicators may ultimately reach the same conclusion as in a prior decision, they are not compelled to do so as a default starting point as the burden of proof to establish eligibility for an immigration benefit always lies with the petitioner.

The previous policy instructed officers to give deference to the findings of a previously approved petition, as long as the key elements were unchanged and there was no evidence of a material error or fraud related to the prior determination. The updated policy guidance rescinds the previous policy.

Under the law, the burden of proof in establishing eligibility for the visa petition extension is on the petitioner, regardless of whether USCIS previously approved a petition. The adjudicator’s determination is based on the merits of each case, and officers may request additional evidence if the petitioner has not submitted sufficient evidence to establish eligibility.

This new policy will not do anything to protect the interest of the U.S. worker, it will only further slow down the adjudication process and burden U.S. employers with requests for information already provided for.  This requirement shows a lack of respect for the adjudication process, by not respecting the work of the previous adjudicator.

If you have a new or renewal non-immigrant case that you would like our help with, please call our office at 513-791-1673.

[contentblock id=5 img=gcb.png]

Filed Under: Employment Visas

USCIS Defines affiliate and subsidiary for the purpose of filing fees

August 28, 2017 by Thomas Geygan

USCIS issued a policy memo with definitions of “affiliate” and “subsidiary” to be used for determining the appropriate ACWIA fee. Memo states that H-1B employees of the parent company should not be counted toward the total number of full-time equivalent employees when determining the ACWIA fee.

Filed Under: Employment, Employment Visas, Green Card

Court Extends Stay of STEM OPT Rule for Additional 90 Days

January 26, 2016 by Thomas Geygan

CourtBldgThe U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted DHS’s motion for limited relief from the court’s August 12, 2015, order, and ordered that vacatur of the 17-month STEM OPT extension be further stayed from its original deadline of February 12, 2016, until May 10, 2016. In its opinion, the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that it did not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief. The court also found that, in light of the “unexpected and unprecedented” 50,500 public comments received in response to DHS’s October 19, 2015, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, “extraordinary circumstances” existed that warranted modifying the court’s previous order

 

[contentblock id=1 img=html.png]

Filed Under: Employment, Employment Visas, Green Card, Reform/New Laws

DOS Releases Cable on H-1B Adjudications Involving Changes in Place of Employment

December 23, 2015 by Thomas Geygan

DOS released a cable summarizing USCIS’s July 21, 2015, policy guidance on Matter of Simeio Solutions, LLC, which held that an H-1B petitioner must file an amended or new H-1B petition when a new labor condition application (LCA) is required because of a change in the place of employment. The cable explains when an amended or new petition is and is not required, and also provides guidelines for consular officers regarding Simeio’s implementation.

Filed Under: Employment, Employment Visas

L-1 and H-1B Supplemental Fee Increases

December 23, 2015 by Thomas Geygan

As a result of the FY2016 omnibus appropriations bill passed on December 18, 2015, the supplemental fees for L-1 and H-1B petitions are increasing for companies that employ 50 or more employees in the United States and have more than 50 percent of their U.S. workforce in H-1B, L-1A, or L-1B nonimmigrant status. Specifically, the previously expired fees for L-1 petitions will increase from $2,250 to $4,500, and the fees for H-1B petitions will increase from $2,000 to $4,000. These supplemental fees must be paid on initial and extension petitions

Filed Under: Employment, Employment Visas, Uncategorized

Next Page »

Client Resources

May 15, 2017

 

More Posts from this Category

Featured Posts

Biden administration considers migrant restrictions similar to Trump policies.

Asylum rates drop as immigration cases are fast-tracked.

Contact Us

Geygan & Geygan, Ltd.

8050 Hosbrook Road, Suite 107
Cincinnati, Ohio 45236
Tel 513-791-1673
Fax 513-791-1683
info@geygan.com

Disclaimer and Privacy Policy

Lawyer Thomas Geygan | Featured Attorney Immigration

Copyright © 2023 · Enterprise Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in